Turnpike revenues should benefit Northern Ohio

Published:

County commissioners from northern Ohio, including Portage County Commissioner Kathleen Chandler, are voicing concerns about the use of revenues Gov. John Kasich's plan for the Ohio Turnpike is expected to generate.

Specifically, they are seeking legislative guarantees that most of the proceeds will be used for infrastructure improvements north of U.S. 30 and that local commuters who use the turnpike on a daily basis won't be subject to increasing tolls.

Their rationale is that the turnpike, which runs east-west from the Pennsylvania to Indiana borders, is a northern Ohio highway and that the revenues Kasich is projecting ought to be used in the region where the tolls have been paid rather than being used for improvements throughout the state.

Kasich's plan for the turnpike calls for the state to borrow about $1.5 billion, through bonds issued against future tolls, to pay for infrastructure improvements. The governor says the $1.5 billion could leverage a matching amount in local and federal funding.

Lorain County Commissioner Ted Calo, who testified Feb. 26 before the Ohio House Finance Committee, noted that the governor has given assurances that the turnpike is not going to be sold or privatized, that workers will not be laid off and that proceeds from any bonds issued against the highway would be kept in northern Ohio. However, without legislation specifying how revenues are to be distributed, "there will be no way to ensure that promises are kept after the money changes hands," he said. The governor's word alone isn't law.

Chandler, a former state legislator who returned to the commissioners' office in January, co-signed Calo's testimony. Two turnpike exits are located in Portage County.

The northern Ohio officials raise a valid point. If Kasich's plan generates the revenue he projects, a great deal of money will be generated for road and bridge work.

Northern Ohio travelers -- including commuters -- have been paying tolls for the turnpike since 1955. This region ought to be the primary beneficiary of the revenues generated. A legislative guarantee is a good idea.

Comments

Signed in as

By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. The Gateway News doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Want to leave your comments?

Sign in or Register to comment.

  • Maybe the most balanced piece I have read on the issue. As a southern Ohioan, I agree that most of the proceeds from the bonding plan, but not all, should be spent in the vicinity of the turnpike. More than half the tolls are paid by out of state travelers, accessing the turnpike from I-75, I-71, and I-77. Everyone in Ohio should benefit from the plan. Otherwise, forget it and let all areas of the state continue to fall apart.